Dingulu G

Université Paris Cité

3
Publications
1
h-index
(3 citations, 10 total works)

Research Topics

Gut microbiota and health (2) Nutrition and Health in Aging (2) Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (2) Inflammatory Bowel Disease (1) Probiotics and Fermented Foods (1)

PFAPA Syndrome Publications

Symptom course of PFAPA syndrome.

Labouret M, Elhani I, Cavelot S, Dingulu G, Jouret M , et al.
Pediatric rheumatology online journal

Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome is the most common cause of autoinflammatory periodic fever in children. It is generally considered to be a self-limiting condition that resolves spontaneously over time. To evaluate age and delay to recovery of patients with PFAPA syndrome. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with PFAPA syndrome at the Versailles Hospital (Paris, France) and included in the Juvenile Inflammatory Rheumatism (JIR) cohort between 2016 and February 2023. Recovery was defined as the absence of any febrile PFAPA episode in the past year. Patients with either no reported febrile episode or insufficient information on fever status over the last 12 months were contacted by telephone. 209 patients with PFAPA syndrome were included. Overall, 56 (27%) patients experienced resolution of periodic fever, 119 (57%) were still active and 34 (16%) patients were lost to follow-up. Among recovered patients, the median duration of symptoms was 5.43 years (Q1-Q3: 2.97–8.65) and the median age at last febrile episode was 8.34 years (Q1-Q3: 5.44–10.24). Of the 119 patients with persistent fever, 10 patients were initially declared cured but relapsed. In patients whose fever resolved, most experienced their last febrile episode before adolescence. The identification of relapses after at least 12 months without a febrile episode raises questions about the definition of recovery.

Suboptimal vaccination coverage of recommended vaccines among French children with recurrent autoinflammatory fever syndromes: a study from the Juvenile Inflammatory Rheumatism cohort.

Rollet-Cohen V, Mirete J, Dingulu G, Hofer F, Hofer M , et al.
Clinical rheumatology

To determine vaccination coverage among a French cohort of children with recurrent autoinflammatory fever syndromes (RFS). All RFS children aged 2 to 19 years from the Juvenile Inflammatory Rheumatism cohort and followed at the French Reference Center for Autoinflammatory Diseases, Versailles Hospital, were included in our observational study. Immunisation status at ages 2, 7 and 15 years and at the last outpatient visit was evaluated according to the standard French vaccine schedule and recommended supplementary vaccines for patients with immunosuppressive therapy. Of 200 patients, 90 (45%) had periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and adenitis syndrome; 52 (26%) had familial Mediterranean fever and 50 (25%) had undefined recurrent fever. Complete immunisation as per the standard schedule was obtained by 32% of patients at 2 years, 28% at 7 years, 6% at 15 years and 44% at the last outpatient visit. Similar or higher coverage was obtained by the last outpatient visit for most vaccines, compared to immunisation coverage at 2 years: pneumococcus (91% vs 88%), diphtheria tetanus poliomyelitis (82% vs 86%), hepatitis B (79% vs 69%) and measles, mumps, rubella (91% vs 50%). No patients with immunosuppressive therapy (n = 14) were up to date for all supplementary immunisations recommended for them. Vaccination coverage for RFS children is suboptimal, especially for infants who present with recurrent febrile episodes. The initial vaccination delay is partially corrected through specialist follow-up in later years. Coverage according to the supplementary vaccine recommendations for immunosuppressed patients is poor. Key Points • Vaccination coverage for RFS children is suboptimal, especially at 2 years of age which is likely due to the prevalence of early recurrent febrile symptoms. • The initial vaccination delay is partially recovered during later follow-up at an expert rheumatology center. • Specific recommendations are particularly difficult to apply to patients on immunosuppressive therapy.

Validation of the new classification criteria for hereditary recurrent fever in an independent cohort: experience from the JIR Cohort Database.

Dingulu G, Georgin-Lavialle S, Koné-Paut I, Pillet P, Pagnier A , et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford, England)

The new classification criteria for the hereditary recurrent fever (HRF) syndrome [cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome (CAPS), TNF-α receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), FMF and mevalonate kinase deficiency] have been published recently. These criteria define two core sets of criteria for each HRF: mixed criteria, including genetic and clinical variables, and clinical criteria, relying on clinical variables only. Our aim was to validate the criteria for HRF in an independent cohort, the JIR Cohort database, an international repository of systemic inflammatory diseases. We enrolled patients with HRF, periodic fever, adenitis, pharyngitis and aphthous stomatitis syndrome (PFAPA) and syndrome of undefined recurrent fever (SURF). A score ranging from zero to two was attributed to their respective genotypes: zero (no mutation), one (non-confirmatory genotype) or two (confirmatory genotype). The criteria were applied to all patients based on genotype scoring. The treating physician's diagnosis served as the gold standard for the determination of specificity. We included 455 patients. The classification criteria showed excellent specificity for CAPS and TRAPS (98% specificity each), fair specificity for FMF (88%), but poor specificity for mevalonate kinase deficiency (58%). Sub-analysis showed excellent accuracy of the mixed criteria for all four HRFs. Misclassification was mainly attributable to clinical criteria sets, with false-positive patients in all four HRF clinical criteria sets. This study represents the final validation step of the HRF classification criteria as recommended by the ACR. Genetic data appear to be necessary to classify patients with HRF correctly.