Hentgen V

Symptom course of PFAPA syndrome.

Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome is the most common cause of autoinflammatory periodic fever in children. It is generally considered to be a self-limiting condition that resolves spontaneously over time. To evaluate age and delay to recovery of patients with PFAPA syndrome. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with PFAPA syndrome at the Versailles Hospital (Paris, France) and included in the Juvenile Inflammatory Rheumatism (JIR) cohort between 2016 and February 2023. Recovery was defined as the absence of any febrile PFAPA episode in the past year. Patients with either no reported febrile episode or insufficient information on fever status over the last 12 months were contacted by telephone. 209 patients with PFAPA syndrome were included. Overall, 56 (27%) patients experienced resolution of periodic fever, 119 (57%) were still active and 34 (16%) patients were lost to follow-up. Among recovered patients, the median duration of symptoms was 5.43 years (Q1-Q3: 2.97–8.65) and the median age at last febrile episode was 8.34 years (Q1-Q3: 5.44–10.24). Of the 119 patients with persistent fever, 10 patients were initially declared cured but relapsed. In patients whose fever resolved, most experienced their last febrile episode before adolescence. The identification of relapses after at least 12 months without a febrile episode raises questions about the definition of recovery.

Unravelling the clinical heterogeneity of undefined recurrent fever over time in the European registries on Autoinflammation.

Systemic autoinflammatory disorders (SAIDs) represent a growing spectrum of diseases characterized by dysregulation of the innate immune system. The most common pediatric autoinflammatory fever syndrome, Periodic Fever, Aphthous Stomatitis, Pharyngitis, Adenitis (PFAPA), has well defined clinical diagnostic criteria, but there is a subset of patients who do not meet these criteria and are classified as undefined autoinflammatory diseases (uAID). This project, endorsed by PRES, supported by the EMERGE fellowship program, aimed to analyze the evolution of symptoms in recurrent fevers without molecular diagnosis in the context of undifferentiated AIDs, focusing on PFAPA and syndrome of undifferentiated recurrent fever (SURF), using data from European AID registries. Data of patients with PFAPA, SURF and uSAID were collected from 3 registries including detailed epidemiological, demographic and clinical data, results of the genetic testing and additional laboratory investigations with retrospective application of the modified Marshall and PRINTO/Eurofever classification criteria on the cohort of PFAPA patients and preliminary SURF criteria on uSAID/SURF patients. Clinical presentation of PFAPA is variable and some patients did not fit the conventional PFAPA criteria and exhibit different symptoms. Some patients did not meet the criteria for either PFAPA or SURF, highlighting the heterogeneity within these groups. The study also explored potential overlaps between PFAPA and SURF/uAID, revealing that some patients exhibited symptoms characteristic of both conditions, emphasizing the need for more precise classification criteria. Patients with recurrent fevers without molecular diagnoses represent a clinically heterogeneous group. Improved classification criteria are needed for both PFAPA and SURF/uAID to accurately identify and manage these patients, ultimately improving clinical outcomes.

Do we need the PFAPA syndrome in adults with non-monogenic periodic fevers?

Suboptimal vaccination coverage of recommended vaccines among French children with recurrent autoinflammatory fever syndromes: a study from the Juvenile Inflammatory Rheumatism cohort.

To determine vaccination coverage among a French cohort of children with recurrent autoinflammatory fever syndromes (RFS). All RFS children aged 2 to 19 years from the Juvenile Inflammatory Rheumatism cohort and followed at the French Reference Center for Autoinflammatory Diseases, Versailles Hospital, were included in our observational study. Immunisation status at ages 2, 7 and 15 years and at the last outpatient visit was evaluated according to the standard French vaccine schedule and recommended supplementary vaccines for patients with immunosuppressive therapy. Of 200 patients, 90 (45%) had periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and adenitis syndrome; 52 (26%) had familial Mediterranean fever and 50 (25%) had undefined recurrent fever. Complete immunisation as per the standard schedule was obtained by 32% of patients at 2 years, 28% at 7 years, 6% at 15 years and 44% at the last outpatient visit. Similar or higher coverage was obtained by the last outpatient visit for most vaccines, compared to immunisation coverage at 2 years: pneumococcus (91% vs 88%), diphtheria tetanus poliomyelitis (82% vs 86%), hepatitis B (79% vs 69%) and measles, mumps, rubella (91% vs 50%). No patients with immunosuppressive therapy (n = 14) were up to date for all supplementary immunisations recommended for them. Vaccination coverage for RFS children is suboptimal, especially for infants who present with recurrent febrile episodes. The initial vaccination delay is partially corrected through specialist follow-up in later years. Coverage according to the supplementary vaccine recommendations for immunosuppressed patients is poor. Key Points • Vaccination coverage for RFS children is suboptimal, especially at 2 years of age which is likely due to the prevalence of early recurrent febrile symptoms. • The initial vaccination delay is partially recovered during later follow-up at an expert rheumatology center. • Specific recommendations are particularly difficult to apply to patients on immunosuppressive therapy.

Validation of the new classification criteria for hereditary recurrent fever in an independent cohort: experience from the JIR Cohort Database.

The new classification criteria for the hereditary recurrent fever (HRF) syndrome [cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome (CAPS), TNF-α receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), FMF and mevalonate kinase deficiency] have been published recently. These criteria define two core sets of criteria for each HRF: mixed criteria, including genetic and clinical variables, and clinical criteria, relying on clinical variables only. Our aim was to validate the criteria for HRF in an independent cohort, the JIR Cohort database, an international repository of systemic inflammatory diseases. We enrolled patients with HRF, periodic fever, adenitis, pharyngitis and aphthous stomatitis syndrome (PFAPA) and syndrome of undefined recurrent fever (SURF). A score ranging from zero to two was attributed to their respective genotypes: zero (no mutation), one (non-confirmatory genotype) or two (confirmatory genotype). The criteria were applied to all patients based on genotype scoring. The treating physician's diagnosis served as the gold standard for the determination of specificity. We included 455 patients. The classification criteria showed excellent specificity for CAPS and TRAPS (98% specificity each), fair specificity for FMF (88%), but poor specificity for mevalonate kinase deficiency (58%). Sub-analysis showed excellent accuracy of the mixed criteria for all four HRFs. Misclassification was mainly attributable to clinical criteria sets, with false-positive patients in all four HRF clinical criteria sets. This study represents the final validation step of the HRF classification criteria as recommended by the ACR. Genetic data appear to be necessary to classify patients with HRF correctly.

Classification criteria for autoinflammatory recurrent fevers.

Different diagnostic and classification criteria are available for hereditary recurrent fevers (HRF)-familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic fever syndrome (TRAPS), mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD) and cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS)-and for the non-hereditary, periodic fever, aphthosis, pharyngitis and adenitis (PFAPA). We aimed to develop and validate new evidence-based classification criteria for HRF/PFAPA. Step 1: selection of clinical, laboratory and genetic candidate variables; step 2: classification of 360 random patients from the Eurofever Registry by a panel of 25 clinicians and 8 geneticists blinded to patients' diagnosis (consensus ≥80%); step 3: statistical analysis for the selection of the best candidate classification criteria; step 4: nominal group technique consensus conference with 33 panellists for the discussion and selection of the final classification criteria; step 5: cross-sectional validation of the novel criteria. The panellists achieved consensus to classify 281 of 360 (78%) patients (32 CAPS, 36 FMF, 56 MKD, 37 PFAPA, 39 TRAPS, 81 undefined recurrent fever). Consensus was reached for two sets of criteria for each HRF, one including genetic and clinical variables, the other with clinical variables only, plus new criteria for PFAPA. The four HRF criteria demonstrated sensitivity of 0.94-1 and specificity of 0.95-1; for PFAPA, criteria sensitivity and specificity were 0.97 and 0.93, respectively. Validation of these criteria in an independent data set of 1018 patients shows a high accuracy (from 0.81 to 0.98). Eurofever proposes a novel set of validated classification criteria for HRF and PFAPA with high sensitivity and specificity.

Health-related quality of life in children with PFAPA syndrome.

Conventionally, PFAPA syndrome is considered as a benign disease compared to other recurrent fevers because it completely passes before adulthood. However, in our clinical practice, fever episodes have a huge impact on daily activities. Observational cohort study using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL™ 4.0) Generic Core and Fatigue Scales. PedsQL™ uses a modular approach to measure the HRQOL in children with acute and chronic health conditions. We used pediatric FMF patients as the control group. We included 33 children with PFAPA and compared them to 27 FMF patients matched for age: preschool-age children (2 to 7 years) and school-age children and youths (8 to18 years). PedsQL™ self-reported scores of children with PFAPA were systematically lower than those of FMF peers for general quality of life and physical and psychosocial functioning (significant only in the preschool-age group). PedsQL™ self-reported fatigue scores of children with PFAPA were significantly lower than those of FMF peers for both preschoolers and school-age children and youths. Parent proxy-reports were not significantly different, even though scores were systematically lower for the parents of PFAPA children. Our study demonstrates, for the first time, that the wellbeing of PFAPA children is poor, with a major impact on psychosocial functioning and increased fatigue. The quality of life of PFAPA children appears to be even lower than that of FMF patients, for whom a lower than normal HRQOL has already been demonstrated.

An international delphi survey for the definition of the variables for the development of new classification criteria for periodic fever aphtous stomatitis pharingitis cervical adenitis (PFAPA).

Diagnosis of Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) is currently based on a set of criteria proposed in 1999 modified from Marshall's criteria. Nevertheless no validated evidence based set of classification criteria for PFAPA has been established so far. The aim of this study was to identify candidate classification criteria PFAPA syndrome using international consensus formation through a Delphi questionnaire survey. A first open-ended questionnaire was sent to adult and pediatric clinicians/researchers, asking to identify the variables thought most likely to be helpful and relevant for the diagnosis of PFAPA. In a second survey, respondents were asked to select, from the list of variables coming from the first survey, the 10 features that they felt were most important, and to rank them in descending order from most important to least important. The response rate to the first and second Delphi was respectively 109/124 (88%) and 141/162 (87%). The number of participants that completed the first and second Delphi was 69/124 (56%) and 110/162 (68%). From the first Delphi we obtained a list of 92 variables, of which 62 were selected in the second Delphi. Variables reaching the top five position of the rank were regular periodicity, aphthous stomatitis, response to corticosteroids, cervical adenitis, and well-being between flares. Our process led to identification of features that were felt to be the most important as candidate classification criteria for PFAPA by a large sample of international rheumatologists. The performance of these items will be tested further in the next phase of the study, through analysis of real patient data.

Is colchicine an effective treatment in periodic fever, aphtous stomatitis, pharyngitis, cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome?

PFAPA syndrome is the most frequent periodic fever syndrome in non-Mediterranean patients. The pathogenesis is unclear and the treatment is purely symptomatic and not standardized. The aim of this study was to assess colchicine's efficacy as prophylactic treatment in PFAPA syndrome and to identify factors able to predict response to treatment. We performed a retrospective, multicentric, cohort study of PFAPA patients under colchicine prophylaxis. PFAPA diagnosis was established according to Feder's criteria. Medical records were reviewed and analyzed for demographic, clinical and laboratory data. We distinguished one responder's group, defined as patients who had no more or twice fewer crises under colchicine and another one of non-responders. Subgroup analyses were performed using non-parametric Mann-Whitney test for quantitative data and calculating odds ratio and confidence interval for qualitative data. Difference between the two groups was considered significant for P-value<0.05 or a confidence interval different from 1. Twenty children, 65% of whom were boys, were analyzed. Their mean age at disease onset was 2.3±1.5 years. Among the nine responder patients, five were MEFV (71%) heterozygotes: M694V mutation in four and V726A once. Heterozygous MEFV gene mutation tended to be more frequent in the responders group (71% versus 43%; OR=0.3 [0.03-2.7]). Non-responder patients had more chronic fatigue (82% versus 33%; OR=9 [1,14-71]) and had more oral aphtosis (82% versus 11%; OR=36 [1,7-141]) than the responders ones. Although not significant, colchicine treatment appeared more effective in patients with less complete PFAPA phenotype and MEFV heterozygosity.

International periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, cervical adenitis syndrome cohort: description of distinct phenotypes in 301 patients.

The aims of this study were to describe the clinical features of periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) and identify distinct phenotypes in a large cohort of patients from different countries. We established a web-based multicentre cohort through an international collaboration within the periodic fevers working party of the Pediatric Rheumatology European Society (PReS). The inclusion criterion was a diagnosis of PFAPA given by an experienced paediatric rheumatologist participating in an international working group on periodic fever syndromes. Of the 301 patients included from the 15 centres, 271 had pharyngitis, 236 cervical adenitis, 171 oral aphthosis and 132 with all three clinical features. A total of 228 patients presented with additional symptoms (131 gastrointestinal symptoms, 86 arthralgias and/or myalgias, 36 skin rashes, 8 neurological symptoms). Thirty-one patients had disease onset after 5 years and they reported more additional symptoms. A positive family history for recurrent fever or recurrent tonsillitis was found in 81 patients (26.9%). Genetic testing for monogenic periodic fever syndromes was performed on 111 patients, who reported fewer occurrences of oral aphthosis or additional symptoms. Twenty-four patients reported symptoms (oral aphthosis and malaise) outside the flares. The CRP was >50 mg/l in the majority (131/190) of the patients tested during the fever. We describe the largest cohort of PFAPA patients presented so far. We confirm that PFAPA may present with varied clinical manifestations and we show the limitations of the commonly used diagnostic criteria. Based on detailed analysis of this cohort, a consensus definition of PFAPA with better-defined criteria should be proposed.

MEFV gene analysis in PFAPA.